The Sportspedia 100 is the yearly edition of the World Sport Ranking for Sportspeople, it is the list of the 100 best sportspeople in the world, across all sports, only utilizing quantitative methods.
The Sportspedia 100 World Ranking has the specific scope of classifying the 100 best sportspeople in the world only utilizing quantitative methods.
The bottom line is to determine who are the best sportspeople in the world for a year, not necessarily within a year.
This means that there are two axes:
1.-Excellence in Performance within a given year relative to competition
Excellence in Performance is worth 60% and it measures:
- The result in the most important competition in the discipline
- World ranking progression within the year
- World-class win-rate
- World-class success in multiple categories
- The best result in a world-class competition
- Ranking within the sport
This total is then multiplied by the competition factor.
The competition factor is used to assess the competitive level of the tournaments where the measured results are obtained.
This considers five categories of variables:
- The sport’s globalization
- The tournamen’s professionalism
- The competitive level within the sport
- The competitive level within the specific discipline
- The competitive level of the specific athletes that were faced
- Each of them has their own variables that determine subscores. There are a total of 28 variables. For example: the international presence of competitors within the tournaments and how many other world-class winners were faced.
Historical significance is worth 40% and it measures:
- The historical ranking within the group of sports
- The historical ranking within their discipline
- The historical ranking within their main category, compared to the time win which the category has existed
- World-Class records of milestones achieved during the year
It took weeks of research and analysing data to determine the historical rankings within the categories, disciplines and group of sports, based on the numbers-based sporting achievements of the competitors in the sport within the last three centuries.
It is important to note that the competitors are only credited with a score in this measure if their sporting achievements for the given year contributed -numerically- to their position within such historical rankings and/or they broke or continued to extend world-class records or milestones.
A Graduate student at Cornell University started the World Sport Ranking as a side project where he could design formulas and equations to quantitatively assess sporting performance across all types of competitive sports, for a specific year.
A lot. Hundreds and hundreds of hours making sure that every single variable is correctly added for every single athlete.
In some cases this meant actions such as counting -one by one- every single nationality represented at a World Ranking at a single discipline -and repeat per discipline within each sport-, or gathering the historical data of the top 20 winningest athletes per each discipline, for dozens of disciplines. Some externalities of this work can further be published.
The overwhelming majority of the work is not represented in this list.
- Why is my favorite athlete not listed there?
We also did not consider how popular an athlete is, nor their impact outside of sporting performance such as their impact in social issues or advancing causes.
It is probably well worth a shot to eventually make other lists that factor those considerations but it was not the scope this time.
- Why are some sports not represented at all?
In other instances there were generational changes that meant the new world leaders within their sport are not yet as dominant or historical as the sportspeople in this list.
There are several other variables that might have affected the individual ranking of the athletes because their sports are not as globalized, are not professionalized or competition is very scattered or largely unorganized. These are all factors that were considered in the competition factor we have previously mentioned.
- Why limit the list to 100 if you say you considered over 3,000 sportspeople?
- Are you sure you did not overlook other athletes that could fit within the top 100?
- Some of the athletes in the list were beaten by athletes outside the list. Why are these not included?
In other words, sportspeople here are benchmarked against the competition they faced throughout the year and also against every single other competitor in the last 300 years.
- Did you include non-competitive sports?
- Why are some teammates listed in different positions all year long?
The 100 Best Sportspeople in the World for the year 2020
The Class of 2020 of the 100 best sportspeople in the world competed in 39 sports and hail from 34 countries, from every permanently inhabited continent.
Some sports and groups of sports were totally absent due to a total or partial shutdown during the pandemic, and some sportspeople did not compete at all due to travel limits.
Nevertheless, the Class of 2020 saw several historical milestones being achieved and extended. Feel free to click on each photo to know more about these individuals. You can also consult the full list as a table here.
Please feel free to contact us with any concern or enquiry you might have at email@example.com.
Revised Edition: On May 22, 2021 we discovered two numerical mistakes in our scoring that have now been corrected directly affecting the following the following results -and by consequence, some others:
1.-Several Bayern München players had not been accounted for some of the team’s records during the season. Some had. This has been corrected, only adjudicating them records in the tournaments where these players participated at least as part of the bench. As a result the list has been expanded to 110 sportspeople.
2.-There was a scoring mistake in one of Ørjan Larsen’s cells: he had correctly been scored the points for being the most successful Age of Empires Players of all time however this number had not been factored by the number of years the Age of Empires series has existed competitively. The score has now been corrected with a change of about 8 points.
We apologize for these mistakes!